Facebook and the Spiritually Inept

Disclaimer: I chose the word inept (clumsy, unsuited for) because I liked the sound and catch of it. The truth is that the word doesn't really cover what I am talking about. I would explain more but...

 

 It is to one’s honor to avoid replying on Facebook (strife),

    but every fool is quick to post (quarrel). Proverbs 20:3

(RCV, the Revised Charles Version)

How often are people tempted to respond unwisely, not just on Facebook but on every social media platform? I would say a lot. 

I want to note that when I say unwise I'm covering not just replying in anger, but replying in ways that demean, demoralize, slander, or to people you have no moral authority to correct. Many people call responders like these trolls and there are a lot of them. We would like to say "Not me!" but the truth is most of us who have spent any time on social media have done it. It's no wonder people are so divided. There is no love, only the desire to be right. 

Now that I'm on the subject of posting, what about the things you post or retweet? A picture of the president (not just the current on either) with slander underneath it?. A picture of a celebrity with the words "You don't speak for us?" Or just a comment that Democrats hate God or Republicans are racist? 

We can claim that we are speaking the truth. but let's be honest, we are not speaking in love. We are stirring up people or as the Bible calls it strife. 

What does this proverb say? It is an honor to avoid strife! So it's good not to reply/post, maybe not easy especially about subjects we're passionate about. 

What if we are doing it? Then we are comparable to the fool, the spiritually inept. A more Biblical definition is the spiritual reprobate. One who refuses to see God and is morally bankrupt. 

So who do you want to look like?  

Photo by Glen Carrie on Unsplash

 

Which calling?

Pick your Call?

I am once again amazed at how God works with people. God gives Isaiah a vision, Moses a burning bush, Sampson strength (no verbal call), and the one I just read again today Ezekiel a word to get up and do what I tell you. God feels a little blunt and severe with Ezekiel, I think.

All of them received a call. I have to wonder if some of them wanted someone else's.  I mean Isaiah's was cool but the end was everything was going to be destroyed. Sampson's made him powerful. Moses heard God and spoke to him, there were also all those miracles. Ezekiel's, my least favorite, get up, and if you don't do what I say you're responsible. Let me throw in Jeremiah who couldn't be quiet even when he wanted. 

God gives to each what they need fitting to who they are and to the calling they are asked to complete. I have to wonder if they would have rather had someone else's calling? I will be honest enough to confess I have. 

What about Moses' calling? I think that might be cool. Can I trade mine in for it. Okay, I would have to wait until I'm 80 to start but still? Wait? What was that? Maybe I don't want to wait until I'm 80 to just begin doing something for God.

Jeremiah? I get the picture of Jim Carrey in Liar, Liar unable to keep from doing something he's uncomfortable with, so maybe not.

Sampson? Forget it! I would probably do dumber than he did.

Isaiah? Now that is cool if you ignore the fact that after his ministry there will only be 10% left. SURE? Hey Mr. District Superintedent, I know I started out with a church of 300 but guess what God grew it down to 30 (29 others and me).

Let's go new Testament..., NO! It ended badly for all of them too. 

Perhaps, I should just trust God and let Him pick. 

Photo by Pavan Trikutam on Unsplash

The Greater Good Can Be Wrong.

 How many times do we do things for the greater good?

The question is what is the greater good? The problem with this is this is different for different people and seemingly at different places.

This is why I try to look to the Bible and God as my true north. Of course, I do know there have and are people who twist the bible to mean what they want, but that is true about everything, not just the Bible. The difference is the Bible tells us we should have it shape us and not the other way around. But I digress.

The question we need to ask is this situation I face actually calls me to do something for the greater good. The classic example is hiding Jews from the Nazis. Of course, it was right to disobey the government to protect them. However, what about an illegal immigrant whose hope is to make it rich in America. Yes, I know many have more noble goals but I'm trying to make a point. Does it matter if the illegal is from Mexico or Canada? 

There are gray areas but I don't want us to get sidetracked in the gray. However, there are times we use the gray areas to justify something more than another greater good that we want for maybe less than honorable reasons.   

Enable GingerCannot connect to Ginger Check your internet connection
or reload the browserDisable in this text fieldRephraseRephrase current sentenceEdit in Ginger×

Choosing to carry guilt.

 

I recently read a book by Andy Stanley, Better Decisions, Fewer Regrets. It was good.  He formulated a question about our decisions that caught my attention, "Is this action going to affect my future?"

He spoke about the brothers of Joseph carrying guilt about what they had done. He pointed out that when bad things started happening in Egypt they asked themselves if this was a result of what they had done to Joseph. 

This caused me to realize that these men may have been asking this question for years. For years, when things went wrong they could have asked themselves, "Did we deserve this?" Made me realize again that our actions affect our future even mentally. Secondly, God doesn't want us consumed with guilt. 

God offers us the same four truths Joseph did. The truth: What you did was evil. Truth: I forgive.  Truth: It is worked out for good. Truth: Come and share my blessings.

We can choose to stay in the famine and in the guilt but God is offering something better.

Spared no Expense

In the movie Jurassic Park, John Hammond the creator of the park says he, "Spared no expense." I would argue, he believed by spending all the money he did he could control the creature in the park. The truth of the matter was made clear in the response, that it was all an illusion, he never had control. As the story unfolds, we see that he didn't. Even if the park hadn't had been compromised at that time the park wasn't under the control of man. We are given the idea that the park would have eventually gone array. 

This thought of lack of control brought me back to something I have been thinking about lately. The illusion of self-control in our own lives. We delude ourselves into thinking we can control our own lives. Science has shown, we will even rewrite our memories to line up with what we want to believe. The Bible teaches we want to be in control. We want to control ourselves and others. We, shall I say it, want to be a god. The problem is of course we aren't god. We will never be a god and neither will anyone else. 

We need help. We need other people to help us. Ultimately though, most of us want to be in control or at least choose our version of lack of control (overeating, drunkenness, shopping, etc.). This is why counseling is so popular (Understand, I'm not downplaying the importance of counseling, it's important.), but we go to someone in the hope they will help us regain control when what we really need to do is to let go. 

 The solution is giving control to God. This is what it means in Romans 10:9 when we confess Jesus as Lord. We make him the boss. We give him control. The strange thing is by giving up control to God, we actually gain control. When we, as Jesus put it, lose our lives we gain them. For Christians, the ongoing struggle is letting Jesus stay in charge, walking in the Spirit as Paul puts it. 

By the way, if you've taken back control it's easy to give it back to God. Yes, walking this way doesn't mean there isn't work and hardship, there is, but what it does give is freedom.

Living in Forgiveness

When I first wrote about my struggle with forgiveness I titled the work Impossible to Forgive. The irony was it wasn’t impossible to forgive. I didn’t realize it at the time but I had been dealing with things that could have been considered impossible to forgive before, in my own life, and in the life of those, I taught about. 

David- impossible

Sampson - impossible

Adam and Eve - impossible

Peter - impossible

Paul - impossible

Yet I taught God forgave these people. This is perhaps why though I didn’t see how I could I knew I should. I had seen it.

I knew that though the person who killed my grandmother and the family member who did such wrong didn’t deserve forgiveness, that I didn’t either. 

I might still call my next book impossible to forgive, but the reality is perhaps what I should call it is living in forgiveness. This is where I want to be and where I want to lead others. 

Confessing Your Sins

 

I have been reading Brant Hansen's book The Truth About Us. It is a very insightful look at who we are as humans. The need to justify ourselves and even to deny the evil that is within us. 

I can't argue against any of the books other than to say if the "evil of mankind" is taken to an extreme we are in as much trouble as "everyone is good" theology. I have said before any extreme leads to error. This however is not what I want to look at, though I do want you to read this book.

Hansen said at one point, "If I don't confess my sins, I'll confess yours." 

We might want to say, "No, not me" but the truth is it usually is. It might not be sin in one sense (it might) but we might complain about their political views, climate views, work ethics. . . We will complain about others rather than look at ourselves.

Hansen is right we need to confess our sins and weaknesses or we will focus on the sins and weaknesses of others.

The one concern, I have, is that we not go from confessing our sins in an attitude of repentance and humility to one of pride. I have known groups that went from confession, repentance, and acceptance times to a time where they talked about the love of God, gave confession of their failures, and acceptance of their sin. Looking at the two they are very close except the second leaves out repentance. 

God loves us wherever we are and no matter what we have done. He will even accept us at the point of death. However, he also loves us enough not to leave us where we are. He wants us and will help us change. The deal is we never can get to the place where we think we have arrived because at that point we become self-righteous. 

Hansen put it this way, "We are either self-righteous or we are humble." Those are the only two options open to us as humans.  

Shalone Cason on Unsplash

Enable GingerCannot connect to Ginger Check your internet connection
or reload the browserDisable in this text fieldRephraseRephrase current sentenceEdit in Ginger×